Data Flute
Published

Tax Reform Limits and Eliminates Popular Deductions

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 made several changes to the manner in which mold shop determine taxable income.

Michael J. Devereux II, CPA, CMP, Partner and Director of Manufacturing, Distribution and Plastics Industry Services, Mueller Prost

Share

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the Act) limits, or outright eliminates, deductions that mold shops are accustomed to claiming. These include the Domestic Production Activities Deduction (eliminated), business entertainment expenditures (eliminated), interest expense (limited) and net operating losses (limited). The changes to these tax provisions will certainly have an impact on mold builders’ tax liabilities. 

While the U.S. Treasury has yet to issue substantive guidance on these new provisions, the following is an overview of these limitations before the issuance of U.S. Treasury Regulations.

The Domestic Production Activities Deduction

Introduced in 2004, the Domestic Production Activities Deduction (DPAD) provides for a deduction equal to 9 percent of the taxable income that is associated with a mold shop’s U.S. manufacturing activities. The Act capped the deduction at 50 percent of the W-2s associated with the otherwise qualifying production activities. The Act eliminated this deduction for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. For calendar-year mold shops, 2017 is the last year for which they are eligible to claim the Domestic Production Activities Deduction. Fiscal-year taxpayers will claim their last DPAD in the year that ends in 2018.

Entertainment Expenditures

Generally, mold shops could deduct 50 percent of both meal and entertainment expenditures that were directly related to or associated with their business before the Act. Also, meals provided to employees for the convenience of the employer were 100-percent deductible before the enactment of the Act. However, the Act disallows a deduction for business entertainment expenses effective January 1, 2018. So, all forms of business entertainment (including but not limited to sports tickets, fishing trips, golf outings and theater tickets) are no longer deductible beginning in 2018 and beyond.

The deduction for business meals is still allowable, subject to the 50-percent limit. Also, the Act eliminates the ability to deduct meals that are provided to employees for the convenience of the mold shop for amounts paid or incurred after December 31, 2025.

The U.S. Treasury is expected to issue guidance concerning these provisions, including how mold shops can split expenditures between meals and entertainment when both types of expenditures are associated with the same event.

While the Act is likely to reduce the federal income tax liabilities for most mold shops, mold builders should evaluate the changes to determine how the changes may impact their tax liabilities in 2018 and beyond.

Interest Expense

Historically, mold shops have been able to deduct their interest expense in the year that the expense was paid or accrued, without limitations. The Act limits the ability of some large mold shops to deduct their interest expense when it is paid or incurred. Mold shops with average annual gross receipts of more than $25 million for the prior three tax years may have limited ability to deduct their interest expense in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017.

The Act limits the deduction for the net interest expense (which is defined as interest expense, less interest income) that is incurred by a mold shop to 30 percent of the shop’s adjusted taxable income. For the first four years that this provision is in effect (tax years 2018 through 2021), adjusted taxable income means taxable income determined without regard to depreciation or amortization. For tax years 2022 and beyond, adjusted taxable income takes into account deductions for depreciation and amortization. Disallowed interest expense is carried forward to future tax years indefinitely. 

Net Operating Losses

Before the Act, net operating losses (NOLs) could be carried back to the company’s two prior tax years to offset income in those years, allowing shops to request refunds from prior years. Also, NOLs could be carried forward for 20 tax years, allowing the shop to offset future income of the company. Further, there was no limitation on the amount of taxable income that shops could offset for regular income tax purposes before the Act.

For losses arising in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the Act limits the net-operating-loss deduction to 80 percent of the taxable income of the year in which the loss is carried. Also, the NOL carryback provisions are repealed for tax years ending after December 31, 2017, and shops may carry forward those NOLs indefinitely. As a result, a fiscal-year mold shop with a tax year ending after December 31, 2017 may not carry back NOLs arising in its tax year that includes December 31, 2017.

While the Act is likely to reduce the federal income tax liabilities for most mold shops, mold builders should evaluate the changes to determine how the changes may impact their tax liabilities in 2018 and beyond.

About the Contributor

Michael J. Devereux II, CPA, CMP is a partner and director of manufacturing, distribution and plastics industry services at Mueller Prost. 

MoldMaking Technology Magazine
Data Flute
MMT Today enews
Techspex
Bonal Meta-Lax Stress Relief Solution
KM CNC Machine Service
Progressive Components
Date Code Inserts

Related Content

Education

The Role of Social Media in Manufacturing

Charles Daniels CFO of Wepco Plastics shares insights on the role of social media in manufacturing, how to improve the “business” side of a small mold shop and continually developing culture.  

Read More

Mold Builder Uses Counter-Intuitive Approach for Mold Challenges

Matrix Tool Inc. answers customers’ hard questions with creative solutions for cavity spacing, tool sizing, runner layout and melt delivery that reveal the benefits of running in a smaller press size at lower cavitation but higher yield.

Read More

MMT Chats: Solving Schedule and Capacity Challenges With ERP

For this MMT Chat, my guests hail from Omega Tool of Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, who share their journey with using enterprise resource planning (ERP)—and their people—to solve their schedule and capacity load monitoring challenges.

Read More
Case Study

OEE Monitoring System Addresses Root Cause of Machine Downtime

Unique sensor and patent-pending algorithm of the Amper machine analytics system measures current draw to quickly and inexpensively inform manufacturers which machines are down and why.

Read More

Read Next

Business Strategy

The Impact of Tax Reform on Capital Expenditures

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act includes a provision for how mold builders should account for capital expenditures.

Read More
3D Printing

Are You a Moldmaker Considering 3D Printing? Consider the 3D Printing Workshop at NPE2024

Presentations will cover 3D printing for mold tooling, material innovation, product development, bridge production and full-scale, high-volume additive manufacturing. 

Read More
Surface Treatment

Reasons to Use Fiber Lasers for Mold Cleaning

Fiber lasers offer a simplicity, speed, control and portability, minimizing mold cleaning risks.

Read More
Data Flute