3 Is the Magic Number
Canon Virginia kicks off this free webinar telling attendees that they will not be sharing something they don’t already know, but will share a few best practices for getting things right the first time—three steps to improve medical tooling and validation times.
An initial real-time poll reveals that the greatest hurdle to getting a product to launch is equal across time-to-market, quality and cost reduction … until time-to-market took the lead in the end. With that in mind, Canon Virginia Inc. reviewed three steps to improve these factors:
-
1. Design for manufacturing (DFM)
- Design for injection mold tooling (DFIM) is really design for moldability.
- There are 3 ways DFIM can help reduce costs and time-to-market:
- To the moldmaker: improve ease of machining; simplify the mold and win over the customer
- To the molder: maintain robust process windows, improve repeatability and quality; speed up validation
- To the manufacturer: ensure incoming parts meet specs, reduce assembly processes and enhance product quality
-
2. Instrumentation and scientific injection molding (SIM)
- Instrumentation is the process of installing a series of sensors within the mold to provide key data points in the injection molding process.
- SIM is a disciplined approach to building robust molding processes for repeatability and high-quality outcomes.
-
3. Part validation
- A second poll reveals that the two greatest benefits of part validation according to attendees are:
Standardized process
Consistent quality
Repeatability
Clear documentation
- Part validation verifies that the part quality is repeatable for mass production, ensures part quality meets customer specs and enables the product to move to market with a documented paper trail.
Some questions that were discussed during the Q&A include:
- How do you balance gross mold adjustments using an unvalidated process during initial mold sampling vs fine-tune adjustments after the process is validated?
- How far should you go in adjusting the mold before SIM begins?
- What type of support does Canon provide at the start of production?
- What if I’m not getting the same results?
- What guidelines do you use to perform DFM?
- Is DFM/DFIM always done in-house?
- Is this a service Canon provides?
- What are the most common problems that you run into when validating manufacturing processes?
- How do I know if the process has been validated correctly?
- What are the benefits of process validation over inspection of the final product?
- How do I decide which one is best?
- Do you go through a checklist during part and tooling DFM review?
- Do you prefer direct or indirect (behind the pin) sensor instrumentation?
- Sometimes changing the machine causes parts being out of spec, poor surface finish, flash, etc. How does Canon address this issue?
- How do you determine shrink rate for the new materials?
- Do you have conformal cooling capability for complex tooling?
- Do you need prototyping to determine shrink rate for new material?
To view this 45-minute webinar, click here
Related Content
-
How to Improve Your Current Efficiency Rate
An alternative approach to taking on more EDM-intensive work when technology and personnel investment is not an option.
-
Mantle TrueShape Advances Medical Mold Manufacture
In a recent case study, Mantle’s 3D-printed inserts enabled a medical device manufacturer to reduce 12-week lead times for prototype mold production to 4 weeks and at one-third of the cost.
-
Pennsylvania Mold Builder Doubles Footprint, Maintains Quality and Company Values
Quality Mold Inc. doubles its manufacturing footprint but maintains its private company values and structure, delivering quality and fast turnaround from mold design and build through sampling.